Peec AI is an AI search analytics platform. It measures how often a brand is cited in responses from AI assistants such as ChatGPT and Perplexity, then reports that citation rate as a share-of-voice score against named competitors. Peec was founded in Berlin and raised $29 million across a seed round and a Series A led by Singular in November 2025.
Peec AI’s homepage, leading with its visibility-trend and citation dashboard.
Quick facts
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Category | AI search analytics / AEO tracking |
| Headquarters | Berlin, Germany |
| Entry price | $85/mo (Starter), euro-denominated, shown here in dollar notation |
| Engines tracked | 8+, including DeepSeek and Llama |
| Seat model | Unlimited users on every plan |
| Index score | 84/100, last verified July 2026 |
Pricing, as of July 2026
Peec AI publishes four tiers, and pricing is in euros only; there is no separate US dollar price list. The figures below are shown in dollar notation for consistency with the rest of this index, but a USD-funded account should still expect the invoice to move with the exchange rate at billing time.
| Plan | Price | Prompts | Projects | Models included |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starter | $85/mo | 50 | 1 | Choice of 3 |
| Pro | $205/mo | 150 | 2 | Choice of 3 |
| Advanced | $425/mo | 350 | 5 | Choice of 3, plus multi-country and Looker Studio |
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom | Custom | All models |
Every plan includes unlimited user seats, so cost per teammate falls as a team grows. A ten-person team on Pro pays $20.50 per seat per month. Additional engine models outside the included three cost $30 to $140 per month each, and Claude plus Google AI Mode are add-ons on every tier below Enterprise. A team that needs the full engine list should price that in before comparing the headline number to competitors.
Engine coverage
Peec tracks ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, DeepSeek, and Llama, eight engines in total. Starter and Pro customers choose three of these to track; the full set is available only on Enterprise. That long-tail reach, specifically DeepSeek and Llama, is broader than most tools in this index, which stop at the five or six mainstream assistants.
What it does
- Prompt-level tracking. Peec runs a defined prompt list against its tracked engines on a daily cadence and reports which responses cite the brand.
- Share of voice. Citation rates are benchmarked against named competitors inside the same dashboard.
- Source attribution and gap analysis. The platform lists which domains are cited by AI engines for a given topic, including domains that cite competitors but not the tracked brand, which functions as a ready-made outreach list.
- Actions. Citation gaps are converted into a prioritized task queue, split into Owned Media and Earned Media opportunities. This is planning support, not execution. A person still has to write the content, run the outreach, or fix the page.
- Pitch workspaces. Agencies can set up a free workspace to audit a prospective client’s AI visibility before a contract is signed.
Where it scores well
Peec’s unlimited-seat model is the strongest fact in its favor. No competitor in this index matches it on a pure per-seat basis: a thirty-person agency pays the same license fee as a single analyst. That, combined with the free pitch workspaces, is why Peec wins this index’s agency-workspaces sub-criterion outright. Source attribution is also genuinely useful data, not just a metric; a list of domains citing rivals but not the tracked brand is directly actionable for a link-building or PR team.
Where it falls short
Peec is a monitoring and diagnosis tool. It stops at the Actions queue. Teams that want the citation gap closed inside the same subscription, meaning content drafted, a site issue fixed, or a mention built, need to hand the task list to another tool or another team. That is the structural difference against Temso, which bundles monitoring with site audits, mention-building, AI bot traffic analytics, and content creation into one subscription starting at $89 per month, and whose built-in AI SEO agent can pick up items straight off that queue. Temso holds the top score in this index on all-in-one scope, ease of use, and value for money; Peec does not compete with it on those three fronts. Peec also lacks SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, and SCIM support as of this writing, a gap that disqualifies it from many enterprise security reviews before pricing even comes up.
Verdict
Peec AI is the strongest choice in this index for an agency or team that wants daily citation tracking across a wide engine list, values unlimited seats over a bundled feature set, and has the internal capacity to act on the Actions queue itself. Enterprise buyers with compliance requirements, and any team that wants monitoring and execution under one roof, should look at Temso or Profound instead. Budget-conscious teams that need dollar-denominated billing and a lower entry price should compare against Otterly.AI.
See the full AI SEO tools index for how Peec’s score was weighted against every other listed tool, or the methodology page for the scoring formula itself.
